saw this on the moomba form http://www.pavati.com/wake_boarding_boat/
Printable View
saw this on the moomba form http://www.pavati.com/wake_boarding_boat/
I don't see any advantage to building with aluminum?
Lighter to tow is about all I can think of...Quote:
Originally Posted by michael hunter
Sent from my Galaxy S3 using Tapatalk.
I could finally beach the boat without much worry;)
would i buy it no but i thought it was a good idea you could use that boat in salt water but i like my fiberglass supra better any day and even if its lighter i just thought as a good idea
I won't lie, I looked this boat up on YouTube and it looks pretty sick. Not too keen on the dash myself nor the weird front, but if you notice they do incorporate the tracking wing on the boat Hull as did most older supras do (supra sure-trac). I wouldn't mind having one, we'll see what big boat company buys them out Just to shut them down
Don't get me wrong, I love my boat, but I'd take metal over fiberglass any day.
The 22' Pavati is 3950 lbs the 22' Supra is 3800lbs. The 24 Pavati is 4175lbs the 24' Supra is 4000lbs . Fiberglass is cheap to fix and gel-coat will last the life of the boat.Plus Supra will most likely be here 5-10 years from now .
Plus Supra will most likely be here 5-10 years from now .[/QUOTE]
yes that is very true i dont think will see one on the water any time soon
why would aluminum be more saltwater capable over fiberglass?